Top 5 Heroes That Marvel Should Recast, Reassign, or Retire
Marvel’s cinematic superheroes are cruising towards an existential crisis. Many of their key heroes (from Disney’s MCU, Fox’s X-Men, and Sony’s Spiderverse) are played by aging actors or their current story arcs are reaching logical conclusions. Disney, Marvel, and Fox need to decide (soon) whether these characters are more like James Bond or Luke Skywalker. What does that mean? Consider that seven actors have portrayed James Bond to-date, and the franchise keeps chugging along; by contrast, Mark Hamill is the only actor to have played Luke Skywalker.
By comparison, we’ve had multiple Spider-Men and Hulks, but only one Wolverine or Iron Man. By emphasizing continuity Marvel’s painted themselves into a corner over the last decade and a half. So the big question is: should these studios recast, reassign, or retire any or all of these heroes? In the next couple of years we’re going to get some pretty clear evidence how they’re leaning, one way or the other.
Related – Avengers 4: Chris Evans Signed On Because “It’s Going To Wrap Everything Up”
When Bryan Singer’s X-Men debuted in 2000, we were introduced to Hugh Jackman’s amazing Wolverine, a career-making role. Arguably, this was the beginning of the modern era of Marvel superhero film (yes, yes, Blade hit in 1998, but X-Men still feels like the beginning to me). Can anyone imagine a non-Jackman Wolverine? All thee Wolverine movies combined have earned $1.4 billion to-date. You’d better believe that Fox wants to take that bet, given the money at stake and the intense fan love for this character — but it’s a damned risky move.
Marvel — whether we’re talking Disney, Sony, or Fox — needs to determine what’s most important to them: the actor, the alter ego, or the superhero. It’s a Bond vs. Skywalker decision. In other words, what does Marvel prioritize: Robert Downey Jr., Tony Stark, or Iron Man. Let’s discuss…
Iron Man / Stark / Downey Jr.
Iron Man was a B-list comic book character before RDJ blew us away with his portrayal of Tony Stark in 2008. Similar to Jackman’s Wolverine, it’s hard to imagine anyone else as Stark/Iron Man. However, in the comics many others have worn the armor (sometimes, the suit is even AI-controlled). Iron Man can exist without Tony Stark, but can Marvel part ways with RDJ?
Stark is central to the MCU, his name and his presence are everywhere. However, RDJ turned 50 a couple years ago — playing the action hero over 50 is tenuous — although as Iron Man he is often depicted via CG (similar to Hulk). It’s conceivable that RDJ could continue in the MCU as Stark only, a defacto father figure; perhaps he passes along the Iron Man mantle while he assumes a background supporting or management role. Consequently, RDJ could continue on with the MCU for years as Stark, but maybe it’s best to hand off the keys to the suit to a younger protege, which could seriously energize Iron Man 4 (if Marvel decides to go that way).
Decision: REASSIGN
Captain America / Rogers / Evans
It took Chris Evans a while to connect with Steve Rogers/Captain America, he even fancied walking away a time or two, but Evans found his footing and his Rogers/Cap has become the moral compass of the MCU, and a great counterpoint and foil to RDJ’s Iron Man. However, if you’ve followed the comics over the last decade you’ve seen Cap killed, resurrected, live a full life in another dimension, grow old, and even become a Hydra villain — it’s been a pretty wild ride. During this time Cap’s best buddy, Bucky Barnes, once carried the shield and established a darker and gun-happy version of the Captain America. Sam Wilson’s Falcon has also assumed the role, resulting in multiple Captain Americas at various times in the comics.
The interesting thing is, Evans’ Rogers is not nearly as important to the MCU as RDJ’s Stark. Were Evans to depart, it might not have as large an impact on the storytelling — particularly given the character’s history with Wilson and Barnes.
The MCU version of Barnes (Sebastian Stan) appears poised to step into the role, either during or after Avengers: Infinity War — he’s earned the shot. However, Falcon (Anthony Mackie) would also be a fantastic choice to pick up the shield, and present a high-flying version of the Sentinel of Liberty. However, we think it’s more likely that Barnes’ Winter Soldier will complete his redemption story and honor his friend, as there’s a very good chance Evans walks into the sunset or (more likely) sacrifices himself to save others as the ultimate heroic gesture in one of the next two Avengers films.
Decision: REASSIGN
Page 2:
#3-#1
Continue Reading
| 1 | 2 | Next > > |
Wolverine / Logan / Jackman
There’s not much more to say regarding Jackman’s Wolverine, it set the standard for gravitas and commitment to the role in Marvel films. It’s fair to say that Jackman’s initial performance in Singer’s X-Men opened the doors for other top-notch actors to enter the field (RDJ, Sam Jackson, Josh Brolin, etc.) However, after seventeen years playing Wolverine, Jackman walked away with style; he also closed the book on Wolverine on film… or did he? Remember that Logan was outside of continuity, it was a classic “What If” storyline (Marvel has been publishing “What If” comics for decades). Meanwhile, Fox has been playing fast and loose with time, as X-Men First Class (2011) introduced a parallel narrative that did more to confuse their storytelling than align it.
Fox knows that no one can replace Jackman, but they also know that this character cannot be off-the-board for long, he’s just too iconic and too central to X-Men lore.
The obvious problem with such a character-defining portrayal: how do you follow it up? The easy answer is also the hardest: don’t do anything. Give the character a break for a few years, then bring him back with a new actor in a big, splashy return to the big screen. Build some anticipation, make it count!
Decision: RETIRE
Hulk / Banner / Ruffalo
Bruce Banner is not the only Hulk. That seems odd to say, particularly if you grew up with the CBS TV version in the 70s. In the comics there have been multiple characters cursed with this Gamma-irradiated beast — Red Hulk, Amadeus Cho, She-Hulk, Professor Hulk, Joe Fixit, Skaar, etc. Despite Hulk’s long-running successes in TV and comics, his stand-alone film iterations haven’t exactly caught on with the public — we’re now onto our third Hulk actor on film: Eric Bana, Edward Norton, Mark Ruffalo. Everyone fell in love with Ruffalo’s Banner and Hulk in The Avengers (2012), and there’s palpable excitement regarding his role in the upcoming Thor: Ragnarok (a talking Hulk!)
Ruffalo is a contemporary of RDJ (that means he’s getting old), but given that his portrayal of Hulk is motion-captured it’s conceivable that Ruffalo could continue playing Banner for years and Hulk can just continue on as a CG character. However, at a certain point it’s going to be weird to see a balding or a greying Hulk. Marvel and Universal are also battling over the rights to Hulk, so it’s unlikely we’ll get another stand-alone Hulk any time soon. Perhaps the best move for Marvel would be to continue using Hulk as a supporting character, but maybe introduce a red or female version of the character, to interject something new and fresh.
Decision: RECAST
ProfessorX / Xavier-Stewart / McAvoy
Fox must have a real love/hate relationship with Logan. If it wasn’t bad enough for Fox that Jackman ended his Wolverine role, this same film also marked the final entry in Patrick Stewart’s extraordinary Professor X/Charles Xavier portrayal. Making matters somewhat more confusing is the recent rise of James McAvoy, who played a younger version of Xavier in three — soon to be four — X-Men films (the ones with all the confusing time-travel stuff). Deciding where exactly the current X-Men timeline resides is a fair and open question, and it’s also anyone’s guess what happens after the next X-Men film. Fox is 1000% continuing with X-Men movies, but now Deadpool has thrown a wrench into things too (example: there are now two concurrent versions of Colossus in these films). Awkward! Oh, if you’re paying attention, you’ll recall that Stewart’s Professor X was also killed in X-Men: The Last Stand… but that didn’t take, obviously.
That leaves the current status of Wolverine (dead), and Professor X (twice dead, but still living), and the whole confusing X-Men overlapping/retconning/conflicting timeline stuff. Whew, this is not easy stuff to keep straight. It’s a reasonable bet that Fox reboots the whole damned thing after next year’s X-Men: Dark Phoenix film (in the comics, a whole bunch of characters are killed). However, much like Wolverine, Fox might be wise to let Professor X take a break for a while — Deadpool’s X-Force movie seems like the next logical chapter in this universe, and maybe it should be the only one for now, too.
Decision: RETIRE
You might notice that we didn’t discuss CG versions for any of the above characters. In X-Men: The Last Stand we saw digitally de-aged versions of Professor X and Magneto, while in Logan Jackman’s Wolverine faced-off against a very believable CG doppleganger. CG characters might very well be a viable fourth option for this debate, but let’s save that perilous trip into the uncanny valley for another day.
Where do you stand regarding the future of Marvel’s aging heroes? Let us know in the comments down below!
Don’t forget to share this post on your Facebook wall and with your Twitter followers! Just hit the buttons on the top of this page.
Page 1:
#5-#4
Continue Reading
| < < PREVIOUS | 1 | 2 |
